Climate change added $8 billion to Superstorm Sandy’s damages, study says
Sea level rise triggered by climate change increased the financial toll of 2012’s Superstorm Sandy by $8 billion, according to a new study.
During Sandy — a late fall freak combination of a hurricane and other storms that struck New York and surrounding areas — the seas were almost 4 inches (9.6 centimeters) higher because of human-caused climate change, researchers wrote Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications.
The study authors calculated that those few inches were responsible for 13% of the $62.5 billion in damages caused by the storm, flooding an additional 36,000 homes.
Sandy killed 147 people, 72 in the eastern United States, according to the National Hurricane Center. It was one of the nation’s costliest weather disasters.
Our oceans. Our public lands. Our future.
Get Boiling Point, our new newsletter exploring climate change and the environment, and become part of the conversation — and the solution.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
While past studies have determined that global warming was a factor in extreme weather events — either by increasing the chance of them happening or by making them stronger — the new study is one of the first to tally the human costs of climate change from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas.
“In most cases, flooding was made worse by sea level rise and we show how much worse,” said study co-author Philip Orton, a physical oceanographer at the Stevens Institute of Technology in New Jersey.
Orton said some of the places that filled with water, such as basement apartments in the New York City area, would have been dry without human-caused sea level rise.
“There are people who experienced significant losses from Hurricane Sandy who would not have experienced those losses but for climate change,” said study lead author Ben Strauss, a sea level scientist who is CEO of Climate Central, a science-and-journalism venture.
To come up with its damage totals, the study first calculated how much of the storm surge — as much as 9 feet (2.7 meters) above the high tide line at the Battery in Manhattan — could be attributed to climate change.
Researchers did this by comparing 2012 observations to climate simulations of a world without global warming. They made calculations for sea level rise overall, then did it for each of the main contributors to sea level rise: warmer waters expanding and extra water from melting glaciers and ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica.
The researchers determined that globally, seas in 2012 were 4.1 inches (10.5 centimeters) higher than in 1900 because of climate change, but the amount was slightly less in New York: 3.8 inches (9.6 centimeters).
The reason is that Alaska’s melting glaciers and Greenland’s melting ice sheet are relatively close to the East Coast, and the physics of sea level rise puts the biggest increases on the opposite end of the globe from the biggest melts, said study co-author Bob Kopp, director of Rutgers University’s Institute of Earth, Oceans and Atmospheric Sciences.
The planet is literally in hot water and that will have dire consequences for humanity, warns a new IPCC report on the state of the world’s oceans and ice.
Then the researchers looked at where the flooding was and what computer simulations showed would have happened with four inches less water. In some places, such as Howard Beach in Queens, it was a big deal, Orton said.
These calculations for sea level rise from climate change alone seem to make sense, said Steve Nerem, a scientist who studies sea rise at the University of Colorado and was not part of the research. Nerem said he wasn’t qualified to comment on the damage calculations but is a bit skeptical because 4 inches on such a large storm surge doesn’t seem so huge.
Susan Cutter, director of the University of South Carolina’s Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute who also wasn’t part of the research, said the study’s damage estimates seem reasonable to her.
Study author Strauss pointed out that Hurricane Irene in 2011 showed that the first five feet (1.5 meters) of flooding doesn’t do nearly as much damage as what follows. Then, he said, the damage soars at an increasingly higher rate per inch.
One way to think about that, Strauss said, is that the extra few inches can put enough water above a house’s lowest electrical outlet to require expensive fixes.
Super storm Sandy washed away years of NYU scientists’ work
Craig Fugate, who was director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency when Sandy struck, said he can’t make a judgment on specific storms like Sandy being more costly because of climate change. But in general, he said, storms are worsening because of climate change.
After Sandy, Fugate said, then-President Obama turned to him and stated: “The debate on climate change is over, we must start talking about climate adaptation.”
