Who is ‘electable’ — and who gets to decide?
WASHINGTON — Is President Biden electable? Is Donald Trump?
A lot turns on what voters think about those questions.
The belief that Biden was the most electable candidate was key to his winning the Democratic nomination in 2020. This year, Republicans seeking to undermine Trump’s chances of getting a rematch have also leaned on electability — telling voters that even if they like the former president, they should not renominate a person whom they blame for losses in 2018, 2020 and 2022.
Electability can be a powerful argument, overriding other criteria, like agreement on ideology. A Washington Post/ABC News poll in February 2020, for example, showed that Democrats, 58%-38%, preferred a candidate who was electable to one who agreed with them on big issues.
Get our L.A. Times Politics newsletter
The latest news, analysis and insights from our politics team.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
But claims about electability may not have the same effect in a Republican primary, recent research indicates. And if that’s the case, Trump might have a clearer shot at the nomination than his rivals hope.
Who’s electable?
“Democrats and Republicans have different calculations about electability,” said Seth Masket, a political scientist at the University of Denver who has been studying that question.
Last month, as part of that research, Masket surveyed county-level party chairs in both parties, asking whether they thought it was more important when recruiting candidates to find people who agreed with much of what the party believes or to find those who could win in November.
Democratic party chairs divided closely on that question, Masket found. Republicans, by contrast, heavily favored candidates who shared the party’s views.
When asked specifically about presidential candidates, the party chairs showed a similar pattern: Democrats overwhelmingly favored finding a presidential nominee they thought could win in November. Republicans narrowly preferred a candidate with whom they agreed on major issues.
The Democratic hyperfocus on electability is a relatively recent thing. In 2008, for example, Democratic voters turned their backs on then-Sen. Hillary Clinton in favor of Sen. Barack Obama, despite Clinton having more of the experience in government and politics that usually argues in favor of electability.
For many years, in fact, a stereotype of the major parties held that Republicans were by far the more pragmatic: “Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line,” the saying went.
The new-found emphasis on electability has been controversial among Democrats. Many supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont felt that party officials wrongly used arguments about electability to disparage his candidacy in 2016 and again in 2020.
Arguments about electability can be “abused,” Masket noted. “It’s treated as a kind of cudgel for forcing out, or pushing down, candidates who are not moderate, white men.”
In the abstract, he noted, party officials will often say they want to diversify their slate of candidates, but when women or people of color step forward to run, “they’ll say, ‘I’m not sure that candidate can win’ ... even when there’s not a much evidence” to support the skepticism, he said.
At the same time, there’s a strong argument that the two parties’ differing approaches to electability greatly helped Democrats keep control of the Senate in the 2022 midterm election.
In choosing their 2022 nominees, Democrats continued their pattern of putting a big premium on perceived electability.
Republicans, notably, did not. Party leaders in many cases stayed out of primary contests, deferring to Trump. And primary voters chose a raft of candidates for the Senate and governorships who either had little or no experience running for office or whose views hewed to the far right of the party, or both.
The issue of whether those candidates were electable wasn’t ignored during the primaries; it came up often. In New Hampshire, to take one example, the state’s Republican governor, Chris Sununu, called retired Gen. Don Bolduc “not a serious candidate” for the Senate.
But just as frequently, Republican voters batted aside such concerns. Bolduc won his primary, then went on to prove Sununu correct, losing the general election to incumbent Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan by 10 points. The same pattern prevailed in other swing states, including Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, costing the GOP a chance to regain the Senate majority.
The seeming lack of emphasis among Republicans on getting candidates who can prevail in a general election baffles many Democrats, who often ask whether the GOP cares more about ideology than winning.
The issue is more complicated than that.
As Masket notes, both parties’ views are shaped by their recent histories. In 1992, after losing five of the previous six presidential elections, Democrats turned to a moderate candidate, Bill Clinton, to change their party’s image, and they won. In 2020, after the shock of Trump’s victory, “they doubled down on electability” and nominated Biden. And won.
Republicans had the opposite experience. Conventional wisdom held in 2016 that Trump couldn’t be elected. He won the nomination anyway.
“Republicans sort of blew off electability, and it worked for them,” Masket said.
The factionalism within the Republican Party has also been far more disruptive than among Democrats in recent years, said Natalie Jackson, director of research at the Public Religion Research Institute.
In 2020, after Biden won the South Carolina primary, three of his rivals dropped out of the race in quick succession, allowing him to rapidly consolidate support.
“We don’t see Republicans doing that,” either in 2016, when rival candidates failed to come up with any joint strategy to defeat Trump, or subsequently, Jackson said.
“The party elites think they’ll lose voters” if they’re seen to be pushing against Trump-affiliated candidates, Jackson noted. “That hurts them in general elections because the Republican primary electorate is looking so far to the right.”
One complicating factor, said Sarah Longwell, a Republican strategist who opposes Trump, is that the former president’s die-hard supporters, who make up somewhere around 30% of the party’s voters, won’t accept the argument that he can’t win because they don’t accept that he ever lost.
“They don’t have the same electability concerns” because “they believe the election was stolen,” she said.
Nonetheless, she said, concern about electability runs strong among another large swath of GOP voters.
“I hear the electability argument in focus groups all the time,” she said. “When people talk about [Florida Gov.] Ron DeSantis, they call him Trump without the baggage,” she said. “They think he won’t alienate swing voters” the way Trump does.
“There’s a cohort of Republicans for whom electability is a huge deal,” she added. “The big unknown is whether that cohort is bigger than the ones who are with Trump — ride or die.”
Check out "The Times" podcast for essential news and more.
These days, waking up to current events can be, well, daunting. If you’re seeking a more balanced news diet, “The Times” podcast is for you. Gustavo Arellano, along with a diverse set of reporters from the award-winning L.A. Times newsroom, delivers the most interesting stories from the Los Angeles Times every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Listen and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Berkeley IGS/L.A. Times poll
Newsom gets good marks in new poll but faces test with budget crisis
Gov. Gavin Newsom is California’s most popular high-profile politician, but that could be tested by voter concerns over his ability to handle the state’s estimated $22.5-billion deficit, according to a new UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Times. Taryn Luna reports on the details of the survey.
New poll shows most California voters fear gun violence, but Democrats and Republicans are divided
After two high-profile mass shootings in California, the majority of voters surveyed in a new statewide poll said they worry that gun violence will affect them or someone close to them. The survey also revealed a stark political divide over fear about gun violence among Californians, Hannah Wiley reported.
Enjoying this newsletter? Consider subscribing to the Los Angeles Times
Your support helps us deliver the news that matters most. Become a subscriber.
The latest from Washington
News Analysis: Biden’s new asylum proposal could affect the border forever
U.S. immigration politics have shifted on their axis over the last 10 days. Trump and his administration spent years arguing that people who cross the border without permission should not be able to easily apply for asylum in the United States. That decades-old practice no longer worked, Trump and his team insisted. On Feb. 21, Biden proposed a plan that amounts to an endorsement of his predecessor’s position, Hamed Aleaziz reports. International and U.S. law has long allowed people who cross borders to seek protection from persecution. But if implemented, Biden’s proposal would make it very difficult for migrants who travel through another country on their way to the U.S. and then cross the border without permission to win asylum here.
Fetterman, Feinstein health-related absences force Harris back to breaking Senate ties
After a two-month reprieve from the albatross of breaking ties in the closely divided Senate, Vice President Kamala Harris was back on Capitol Hill this week to tip the scales again due to two health-related Democratic absences, Jennifer Haberkorn reported. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), 53, still recovering from a stroke last year, was admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center two weeks ago for clinical depression and may be absent for weeks. And Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), 89, who announced last month she would not seek reelection in 2024, was absent from Washington, saying she’s been hospitalized with shingles.
Biden rallies House Democrats to tout their legislative success to voters
Biden on Wednesday touted his party’s legislative success in the first two years of his administration and urged House Democrats to spend the next two years making sure voters are aware of it too, Nolan McCaskill reported.
The latest from California
With unfounded fraud claims swirling, red California county dumps Dominion voting machines
Swept up in unproven voter fraud claims, the Shasta County Board of Supervisors has upended the county’s election process, canceling its contract with Dominion Voting Systems and opting this week to pursue, among other options, the possibility of counting votes by hand. Supervisor Kevin Crye, part of a newly empowered hard-right majority on the board, also announced at Tuesday’s board meeting that he had been in touch with MyPillow Chief Executive Mike Lindell, a prominent pro-Trump election conspiracy theorist, about supporting a pilot voting system in the rural Northern California county, Jessica Garrison reported.
Column: Trump tormentor, whiteboard wizard — it’s the brand that matters in California Senate race
When Rep. Adam B. Schiff recently brought his U.S. Senate campaign to Northern California, 500 people showed up for his stop at a 55-and-older community nestled in the green, rolling hills of the East Bay Area. Dozens more were turned away. A few weeks earlier, Rep. Katie Porter drew a similar overflow crowd when she kicked off her bid to replace Feinstein with an appearance before the same Democratic audience. It used to be that House members like Schiff and Porter spent their days toiling in relative obscurity, but social media has changed that, Mark Barabak writes in his column.
Mayor Bass endorses Rep. Barbara Lee in Senate race
A little over a week after entering California’s U.S. Senate race, Rep. Barbara Lee on Wednesday picked up the support of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, one of the state’s most prominent and influential politicians. Bass, a fellow Democrat who served in Congress with Lee for over a decade, endorsed her former colleague and friend in the contest to replace Feinstein, Benjamin Oreskes reported.
Column: Hydrogen cars should be a bigger part of California’s battle against carbon emissions
We’ve turned way off course from the “hydrogen highway” that former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tried to chart for California two decades ago. Now, some state legislators are trying to get us back on the road, George Skelton writes in his column. They want the state to invest more money into nurturing the use of hydrogen vehicles, just as California is pouring funds into plug-in electric cars. They argue that California — and the nation — shouldn’t be putting all its eggs in one basket: plug-in vehicles.
Pandemic food benefits are ending for millions of Californians. Now what?
Nearly 3 million households in California will stop receiving extra federal food benefits granted during the COVID-19 pandemic, a squeeze on budgets that comes as people continue to struggle with the rising cost of living, Mackenzie Mays reported.
Sirhan Sirhan, convicted of killing Robert F. Kennedy, denied parole by California board
Sirhan Sirhan was again denied parole Wednesday, 55 years after he shot and killed presidential candidate Sen. Robert F. Kennedy in Los Angeles, Christian Martinez reported. The latest denial by a California board in San Diego came after Sirhan was found suitable for parole by a two-person panel in 2021, but that decision was reversed by Newsom.
Two men who plotted to bomb California Democrats’ headquarters sentenced to prison
Two alleged militia members in Northern California who plotted to bomb the state Democratic headquarters in Sacramento and “go to war” over the 2020 presidential election have been sentenced to prison, Salvador Hernandez reported.
Sign up for our California Politics newsletter to get the best of The Times’ state politics reporting.
Stay in touch
Keep up with breaking news on our Politics page. And are you following us on Twitter at @latimespolitics?
Did someone forward you this? Sign up here to get Essential Politics in your inbox.
Until next time, send your comments, suggestions and news tips to politics@latimes.com.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.