Advertisement

NFL wants Brian Flores racial discrimination lawsuit to go to arbitration

Miami Dolphins coach Brian Flores stands on the sideline during a game.
Miami Dolphins coach Brian Flores stands on the sideline during a game against the New York Jets in November. Flores, now an assistant coach with the Pittsburgh Steelers, is suing the NFL for racial discrimination.
(Adam Hunger / Associated Press)
Share via

The NFL and six of its teams have formally moved in a New York court to force a lawsuit alleging that they engaged in racial discrimination into arbitration where NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell would be the arbitrator.

The league and the teams filed papers late Tuesday with a judge presiding over a lawsuit filed by Brian Flores after he was fired in January as head coach of the Miami Dolphins. The NFL said employment agreements with teams signed by Flores and other coaches contain provisions that require the arbitration of all disputes.

Flores now works as an assistant coach for the Pittsburgh Steelers. He alleged in his lawsuit that has since been joined by two other Black coaches that the league engages in racist hiring practices despite its claims to the contrary.

Advertisement

The NFL has insisted the lawsuit is “without merit,” although Goodell said before the Super Bowl that “all of the allegations, whether they were based on racism or discrimination or the integrity of our game, all of those to me were very disturbing.”

Details in a lawsuit by former Dolphins coach Brian Flores appear to show that NFL teams still aren’t taking Black coaching candidates seriously.

A Manhattan federal judge is unlikely to rule on the arbitration issue until late summer, at the earliest.

David Gottlieb, a lawyer for the coaches, said Wednesday that moving the case to the secrecy of arbitration was, in effect, “stripping our clients of their rights.”

Advertisement

“Arbitration is privatizing the judicial branch,” Gottlieb said. “All we’re asking for is an open and fair process.”

He said lawyers for the coaches will argue that the lawsuit against the league belongs in federal court because any agreements calling for arbitration were signed with the teams rather than the league.

In March, Flores attorney Douglas Wigdor wrote a letter to Goodell, saying “arbitration is not transparent” and urging him to let the lawsuit stay before a judge.

Advertisement

Rams assistant coach Thomas Brown has head coaching aspirations but opportunities are rare in the NFL for Black coaches. Will Brian Flores’ lawsuit bring change?

In its papers, the league argued that the discrimination lawsuit’s claims were not properly before the Manhattan court because multiple arbitration agreements signed by the coaches require arbitration.

The league also defended its record on fighting discrimination, saying “diversity, equity and inclusion are core NFL values.”

It cited its implementation nearly two decades ago of the “Rooney Rule,” which now requires teams to interview at least two minority candidates for any head-coach opening and at least one candidate in person.

In his February lawsuit, Flores said the league remained “rife with racism” and continues to deny Black coaches positions for racial reasons, making it difficult for them to become general managers, head coaches, offensive and defensive coordinators and quarterbacks coaches in particular.

Brian Flores’ journey to NFL coach explains the attraction of the game; his explosive lawsuit alleging racist hiring practices tests that commitment.

His lawsuit sought class-action status and unspecified damages. In their papers Tuesday, the league, along with the New York Giants, Miami Dolphins, Denver Broncos, Houston Texans, Arizona Cardinals and the Tennessee Titans, insisted that arbitration agreements will require the coaches to assert their claims individually.

The filing came hours before a House committee released a document alleging Washington Commanders owner Dan Snyder conducted a “shadow investigation“ to discredit former employees who claimed workplace sexual harassment. The document said private investigators were hired to intimidate witnesses and an overseas lawsuit was used as a pretext to obtain phone records and emails.

Advertisement