Advertisement

Jordan issues gag order on palace feud as new audio backs accused prince’s claims

Women walk past a poster of Jordan's King Abdullah II on a street in the capital Amman.
Women walk past a poster of Jordan’s King Abdullah II on a street in the capital Amman, on April 6, 2021, after a security crackdown revealed tensions in the monarchy.
(KHALIL MAZRAAWI/AFP via Getty Images)
Share via

Jordan imposed a sweeping gag order on coverage of its palace feud Tuesday after a recording indicated that authorities tried to silence a former crown prince over his meetings with critics, a sign that officials are increasingly nervous about how the rift in the royal family is being perceived.

The recording appears to capture Saturday’s explosive meeting between King Abdullah II’s half-brother, Prince Hamzah, and the military chief of staff that set off the current political crisis. In the wake of that meeting, officials accused Hamzah of being part of a foreign plot to destabilize the kingdom — but no such conspiracy is mentioned on the recording.

Before the audio surfaced, the palace and a mediator close to Hamzah said the royal family was in the process of resolving the crisis. It’s unclear where those efforts stand.

Advertisement

On the recording, Gen. Yousef Huneiti, the military chief of staff, says the prince is being placed under a form of house arrest because of meetings he’s had with individuals who “started talking more than they should.”

The prince raises his voice in anger, accusing the general of threatening him and saying he has no right to issue orders to a member of the royal family.

“You come to me and tell me in my house what to do and who to meet with in my country and from my people? Are you threatening me? ... You come to my house and tell me you and security leaders are threatening me? Not to leave your house, only go to your family and don’t tweet?

Advertisement

“The bad performance of the state is because of me? The failure is because of me? Forgive me, but the mistakes are my fault?” he says.

A member of Jordan’s royal family and a government official are said to be held for ‘security’ reasons, reportedly along with the former crown prince.

Huneiti, speaking in a calm voice, denies threatening him and says he is simply delivering a message from the heads of intelligence and general security. But by then, Hamzah is shouting over him. “Get in your car, sir!” he says.

Neither man mentions the king or a foreign plot. The recording is consistent with the prince’s earlier description of the encounter.

Advertisement

Jordan has long been seen as a bastion of stability in the Middle East. But the COVID-19 pandemic has battered its economy, and Hamzah’s unprecedented criticism of the ruling elite — without naming the king — could lend support to growing complaints about poor governance and human rights abuses.

Reflecting concerns over any sign of instability there, several allies, including the United States, have expressed their strong backing for the king. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan arrived in Jordan on Tuesday in support of Abdullah, according to Saudi state television.

Jordan’s monarchy says the king’s outspoken half brother has agreed to abide by the traditions of the ruling family.

Jordanian analyst Amer Sabaileh, speaking before the gag order was imposed, said the dispute “puts more pressure on the king” to reform the system. He noted that the feud had also divided Jordanians, with many on social media expressing support for Hamzah.

The king “needs to go for fast action that saves the image of the family and the monarchy and the unity of society,” Sabaileh said.

Instead, Jordanian authorities have leveled accusations against Hamzah. On the day after the prince’s meeting with the military chief of staff, Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi announced that authorities had arrested more than a dozen people and foiled a foreign plot, without saying which country was involved.

Hamzah, in a video statement, denied being part of any such conspiracy and lashed out at authorities for what he said were years of corruption and incompetence. He said they were trying to silence him because of his criticism. There has been no word since on his status or that of those who have been arrested.

Advertisement

Some analysts have raised doubts about the suggestion of a foreign plot.

“Among the countries whose names have been bandied about — Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Israel — none have an interest in stoking instability in Jordan or could have believed that an amateurish plot built around a disaffected prince and a handful of acolytes might possibly have overthrown the well-entrenched Abdullah,” Ghaith al-Omari and Robert Satloff of the Washington Institute, a U.S. think tank, wrote in a policy briefing.

Abdullah and Hamzah are both sons of King Hussein, who remains a beloved figure two decades after his death. Upon ascending to the throne in 1999, Abdullah named Hamzah as crown prince, only to revoke the title five years later and give it to his oldest son.

Although Abdullah and Hamzah are said to have good relations generally, Hamzah has at times spoken out against government policies, and more recently had forged ties with powerful tribal leaders in a move seen as a threat to the king.

President Biden’s dilemma on the Iran nuclear deal: Go slow and risk war, or move fast even if it means an imperfect pact that hurts his domestic agenda.

The gag order — which Jordan’s attorney general said was needed to preserve the confidentiality of an ongoing investigation — highlights how restrictions on speech have been tightened in recent years, something the prince alluded to in his statements.

“They always impose gag orders on controversial issues,” said Adam Coogle, deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa for Human Rights Watch. “The only surprising thing is that it wasn’t imposed on Sunday.”

Coogle said that there had been “a real slide in terms of respect for basic rights like free expression. The scope of free media reporting has shrunk to almost nothing. There’s almost no critical coverage in the local press — it’s not really allowed.”

Advertisement