PUC Scrubs Disputed Charge by SDG
The state Public Utilities Commission on Friday rescinded a controversial $4.80 monthly service charge that had alienated San Diego Gas & Electric customers who use relatively little electricity.
The PUC’s action will produce slightly lower bills for customers who use relatively little electricity. Customers who use a lot of electricity will probably see slight increases in their bills.
For the record:
12:00 a.m. July 13, 1988 For the Record
Los Angeles Times Wednesday July 13, 1988 San Diego County Edition Part 1 Page 2 Column 6 Metro Desk 2 inches; 62 words Type of Material: Correction
The $30-million residential electricity rate reduction described in a story Saturday did not represent the total revenue that San Diego Gas & Electric Co. has collected since a $4.80 service charge was instituted Jan. 1. Rather, SDG&E; asked state regulators to approve the $30-million rate reduction to help “offset higher bills . . . (and) improve customer relations” after the $4.80 charge was removed, according to a utility spokesman.
The PUC on Friday ordered SDG&E; to reinstate a $5 minimum bill that was dropped in January when the $4.80 service charge was added.
SDG&E; has collected $30 million since the $4.80 charge was instituted in January. However, commissioners did not endorse SDG&E;’s proposal to return that $30 million to residential customers in the form of lower rates.
Commissioners on Friday indicated that SDG&E; might have to increase its commercial and industrial rates in order to finance that $30-million residential rate decrease. The commission instead voted to take the $30 million into account when an overall rate review is completed later this year.
The commission’s actions on Friday drew a mixed review from Michael Shames, executive director of the Utility Consumer Action Network.
“I’m pleased that the commission saw fit to remove the customer charge, and I am disappointed that it failed to reduce rates by $30 million,” Shames said. Both SDG&E; and UCAN, a San Diego-based consumer group, had recommended that the $30 million be used to lower residential rates.
The PUC, which represents utility customers in commission proceedings, had recommended that the $30 million not be used to finance lower rates. SDG&E; suggested the rate reduction “to improve customer relations,” according to a PUC spokesman.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.