Students Say Prejudice Prevalent on Campus : Education: Incidents involving slurs, graffiti, indifference and insensitivity are reported to a special panel on minority relations at Loyola Marymount University.
In eloquent, often impassioned testimony, more than a dozen Loyola Marymount University students and faculty members addressed a special committee on minority relations Wednesday, describing frustrations among minorities, feelings of not being welcome and outrage over racial slurs, including a classroom incident involving a visiting professor.
The problems, they said, extend from the classroom to extracurricular activities to social life on campus.
“I’m here to tell you I’m tired of insensitivity to minority issues,” said sophomore John Crocker. “Not just to blacks--to Asians, Latinos or anybody else. We just want a fair shake for everyone.”
About 150 students and faculty members crowded into the auditorium of St. Robert’s Hall for the open forum, sponsored by the Select Committee on Minorities. A second forum was held Thursday afternoon.
The 11-member committee of faculty, alumni and community leaders was appointed by President James N. Loughran after five students walked into his office in April and refused to leave until he discussed the issue of race at the private university.
The administration pledged last year to investigate students’ concerns, but, some students said, the racial climate has yet to improve in the new school year.
“The average student on campus doesn’t realize how frustrating this is,” said Patricia Hudson, a freshman who said she has been stopped at least three times since September by security guards and asked what she was doing on campus.
Hudson said she felt she was singled out because she is black.
Sophomore Martha Arevalo, cited an incident on Sept. 29 involving a visiting assistant professor of statistics who allegedly made ethnic and racial slurs in the classroom, causing many students to walk out.
Arevalo, newly elected president of the Concerned Student Union--the group that took over the president’s office in April--said about half a dozen students immediately complained to Seth Thompson, associate dean of liberal arts.
The assistant professor--who was employed as a temporary replacement--was later fired, said university spokeswoman Leah Chester-Davis.
“He was removed from the classroom and in fact dismissed from the university,” Chester-Davis said. “As far as the university is concerned, they’re considering it a personal problem.” Chester-Davis did not elaborate.
Joseph Callinan, dean of the College of Science and Engineering, said the visiting assistant professor was on a one-year appointment to replace a faculty member on sabbatical and had taught several part-time courses over the past two years.
“No complaints were brought to my attention over those courses,” Callinan said. He said he met with the class on Oct. 2, the day the professor was fired. The course is now being taught by other faculty members, he said.
At Wednesday’s forum, students pointed to other incidents, including racist graffiti sprayed across the entrance sign to the university over the Labor Day weekend, and said they believe that there are insufficient numbers of minorities in the faculty and student body. The university said the undergraduate student body is about 31% minority, the same as last year.
Students also said they believe that there is a general attitude of coolness--even fear--toward minority students from some non-minority classmates.
“People are afraid of black people,” said freshman honors student Sandafu Kawah. “People are scared to go and say hello to a black, to an Hispanic person, because they don’t know about Hispanics and blacks and Asians.”
Some students and faculty, including senior Joana Ball, suggested that the university initiate a required course that would include fundamental readings in Latino, Asian-American and African-American literature and history.
“I know more about Japan; I know more about European history and literature sometimes than I know about my own African heritage,” Ball said. “That to me says we’re not welcome.”
Anthony Smulders, an associate dean of science, suggested that the university de-emphasize Scholastic Aptitude Test scores and place more emphasis on grades in its admission policies. Such emphasis, he said, might allow more minority and other students to attend Loyola Marymount.
“I think there’s a lot of subtle racism,” Smulders told the committee. “Not the overt racism like things (written) on the bathroom wall, but subtle, unintentional racism, which I think is worse. It’s a lack of sensitivity, and it’s shown in a number of things.”
Two students involved in April’s takeover, sophomore John Crocker and Hugh Lowe, who graduated last year, said they feared that Loughran was reneging on a promise not to hire an assistant vice president of student affairs until the issue of whether to reorganize the Office of Student Affairs was resolved.
Loughran, however, said Thursday that he has kept all his promises to the students.
“Everything I said I would do, I’ve done,” Loughran said. “If anybody said I reneged on anything, (it’s) not true, absolutely not true.”
Last semester, students objected to a proposal that would have placed six departments, including minority student support services, under the jurisdiction of an assistant vice president of student affairs.
But Joan Gaulene, director of public relations for the university, said the proposal was shelved and is not now being considered. The assistant vice president’s position remains frozen, Gaulene said.
Graciela Limon, a professor of modern languages who chairs the select committee, said its goal is to examine admissions, financial aid, minority student support services, and the hiring and retention of faculty and staff, among other issues, and make recommendations for changes to the president by Dec. 13.
Loughran said he was approached by faculty members to form such a committee before the takeover in April.
“In general throughout last year, I was aware there were some difficulties and we needed to address them,” Loughran said Thursday. “I take this (committee) seriously. . . . We have a commitment to students in general and to minority students in particular, and we’re always looking for ways to improve it.”
According to preliminary figures for the 1989-90 school year, there are 1,199 minority students at Loyola Marymount, Chester-Davis said. Of 4,104 undergraduates, 3,915 responded to the optional question on admissions forms to disclose their racial background, and 189 declined to respond to the question, she said.
Preliminary figures for the 1989-90 school year show that, among tenured, tenure-track and visiting faculty members, the number of minorities has increased from about 10% last year to 11% this year. There are 28 minority faculty members, Chester-Davis said, but a final count on the total number on the faculty for this year was not available.
Committee members, some of whom are alumni, said this is not the first time such issues have been brought to the attention of the administration.
One committee member, attorney Armondo Duron, was one of six students who staged a sit-in in May, 1975, to protest the university’s admissions and financial-aid policies toward Latinos.
“A lot of the problems we confronted then have not gone away,” he said.
Chairman Limon, a 20-year Loyola Marymount faculty member, said April’s takeover was the third since 1971--over the same issues.
“We thought we had accomplished a lot,” Limon said. “Then all of a sudden we have this monster raising its head again.”
Other committee members include Halford Fairchild, a former UCLA assistant professor of psychology; Alfredo Gonzalez, dean of undergraduate studies at Cal State Los Angeles; Frances Gussenhoven, an English professor at Loyola Marymount; Harry Kitano, a professor from the UCLA School of Social Work; Patrick Ogawa, chief of planning of the Los Angeles County Drug Abuse Program; Mark Ridley-Thomas, director of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, West; Paul Rude, Loyola engineering professor; Seth Thompson, associate dean of Loyola’s College of Liberal Arts; and Marina Urbina, a Loyola senior.
As they addressed the committee, students questioned whether its recommendations would ultimately change anything.
“What’s the point of the committee if all they can do is make recommendations about something that’s been going on for 20 years?” one senior asked.
Duron told students that, whatever the committee’s recommendations, the students should consider following through on them by addressing the board of trustees with their concerns.
“We are powerless to change it,” Duron said. “I think the power lies within the students.”
Limon said the committee would incorporate the students’ comments in its Dec. 13 report to the president.
“One of the basic things is to admit the presence of racism,” Limon said. “It should be known that we’re looking squarely in the face of this thing.”
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.