THE HOUSE
To Change Defense Bill
By a vote of 156 to 254, the House rejected a conservative-led attempt to soften military personnel cuts and increase from 180 to 360 days the maximum active-duty time for reservists. This occurred as the House sent to conference with the Senate the Pentagon’s first post-Cold War budget, a $283-billion fiscal 1991 spending bill that is $24 billion under President Bush’s request.
The current uniformed personnel ceiling is 1.9 million. This motion sought to lower it by about 101,500 troops, not 130,000 as recommended by the Democrat-led Armed Services Committee. Bush wants a cut of 38,000 troops.
The longer deployment of reservists would have permitted reserve combat units to be sent to the Persian Gulf. The Pentagon finds the present 180-day limit not long enough to justify combat roles for reservists, given how long it takes to put them in place.
A yes vote was to soften military personnel cuts and double the active-duty time for reservists.
How They Voted Yea Nay No vote Rep. Gallegly (R) x Rep. Lagomarsino (R) x
To Cut SDI Funding
The House voted, 225 to 189, to lower Strategic Defense Initiative funding to a maintenance level of $2.3 billion for fiscal 1991, about half of President Bush’s request for the proposedspace-based defense against incoming missiles. The vote occurred during debate on the 1991 Pentagon budget.
A yes vote was to cut SDI spending to a maintenance level.
How They Voted Yea Nay No vote Rep. Gallegly (R) x Rep. Lagomarsino (R) x
Abortion Issue
By a vote of 200 to 216, the House rejected an amendment permitting women in the military or who are dependents to receive an abortion at military facilities abroad if they pay for it. The amendment to the 1991 defense bill (above) sought to lift a Department of Defense ban on such abortions.
Sponsor Vic Fazio (D-Sacramento) said the amendment would ensure decent medical care for women defending freedom “in the Persian Gulf and elsewhere throughout the world.”
Opponent Barbara F. Vucanovich (R-Nev.) said the amendment would lead to “abortion on demand” at any overseas military installation.”
A yes vote was to permit privately financed abortions at military hospitals abroad.
How They Voted Yea Nay No vote Rep. Gallegly (R) x Rep. Lagomarsino (R) x
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.