Valley PTSA Leaders Back Breakup of L.A. Unified
In a boost to the movement to break up the Los Angeles Unified School District, the executive committee of the San Fernando Valley’s Parent Teacher Student Assn.has unanimously voted to support the effort.
The committee voted Wednesday night after polls of 7,900 PTSA members showed that more than 80% favored separating the Valley from the mammoth school system, the nation’s second largest.
“We were a little surprised the unanimous vote came so quickly,” said Bobbi Farrell, head of a PTSA task force that has been studying the issue. Nearly 30 executive committee members reached their decision after only a few minutes of discussion, Farrell said.
For months, the Valley PTSA--which is known as the 31st District and claims 44,000 members--has carefully maintained a neutral stance on the proposed breakup, studying the potential effects of splitting off Valley schools but stopping short of making recommendations.
The group’s task force has been examining the idea since July. In March, it unveiled drafts of three breakup scenarios that looked at a Valleywide school system, as well as smaller ones within the area.
But Wednesday’s vote was the largest show of community support behind the idea, which has been brewing for a decade with little concrete action beyond the meetings of a handful of activists. It also means that the influential group will be lending its formidable organizing expertise to a movement that has yet to submit a written proposal.
“We knew a lot of people were dissatisfied with how the school district was currently operating, but we thought we’d hear a little more from people who were satisfied,” Farrell said.
The task force polled members in August and again in March for their opinions on the breakup issue in mailed questionnaires. Most proponents questioned the school district’s accountability and said district officials were not responsive and lacked leadership. Farrell said several opponents of secession said the LAUSD was ineffective, but did not believe that splitting it up would be an improvement.
The poll results will be part of a final report the group will distribute in June, Farrell said.
For now, the PTSA will present its findings at community meetings across the Valley and will “start looking even more seriously at how we could effectively separate the Valley into one or more school districts,” said Cathy Flory, the 31st District president.
“Now comes the task to find out [in] which direction we should go,” Flory said. She added that the group will present members with various scenarios, including proposals to split the Valley into either northern and southern districts, eastern and western districts or keep it as a single school system, which would make it the state’s second largest.
Farrell said the PTSA also plans to work with other Valley proponents of a breakup.
Stephanie Carter, a breakup activist whose group has been looking into carving out a Valleywide district since summer, said she hopes the PTSA will join her group’s plans.
Tony Alcala of the Northeast Valley Multi-Ethnic Coalition said he supports the general idea of a breakup but still wants to see the PTSA’s specific plans.
“We have to be very careful to make sure that every community is fairly represented,” Alcala said.
A spokesman for Supt. Sid Thompson expressed concern that the rhetoric from breakup proponents was too vague and did not address how such an action could improve education.
“He’s not diametrically opposed to a reconfiguration of the district if the proposal can identify that it will improve student education,” Brad Sales said of Thompson. “Most of the proposals don’t refer to that.”
School board President Mark Slavkin, who opposes a breakup, said the PTSA will “have a very tough time holding a coalition together over any specific plan.”
“You start making enemies as you get specific,” said Slavkin, who represents the West Valley. “You’ll start stepping on toes, including some and excluding others.”
Flory said the PTSA has no immediate intentions of drawing up concrete plans for a breakup. Nor does the group want to spearhead a breakup movement, she said.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.