State Urged to Shoulder Costs of Secession Study
Mayor Richard Riordan and San Fernando Valley secessionists disagree on countless issues, but on one they have found common ground: both believe someone else, the state of California, should shoulder the costs of studying Los Angeles’ deconstruction.
Now if only they could persuade enough state leaders.
Los Angeles County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky joined advocates of Valley cityhood and Riordan’s chief of staff Monday in asking a state commission charged with reforming local government laws to recommend state funding for an analysis of municipal divorce.
Before they could even make their pitch, however, a powerful state legislator joined the debate, notifying the commission in writing that he would oppose all efforts to have the state pay for a Valley secession study because he considers it a troublesome precedent.
Though numerous state leaders, including Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa, have pledged to help fund a secession study, the opposition by state Sen. Richard K. Rainey (R-Walnut Creek) could prove critical. He chairs the Senate Committee on Local Government, which would likely have to approve such a funding request, expected to total several million dollars.
“If we pay for this study, then legislators must expect other communities to come to Sacramento asking for favorable treatment,” Rainey said. “I fear that once we start down that slippery slope, legislators won’t be able to say no to similar requests.”
Secession group Valley VOTE has collected enough signatures to trigger a study on the consequences of splitting up Los Angeles and forming a separate Valley city--required before an election can take place.
But the highly political question of who should pay for the study remains unanswered, and the study has yet to begin. Valley VOTE leaders argue that forcing secession backers to pay would represent an unconstitutional barrier to the ballot.
Hoping to resolve the issue, Assemblyman Bob Hertzberg (D-Sherman Oaks) asked the Commission on Local Governance for the 21st Century to quickly take up the secession funding issue and give him a recommendation before the end of this year’s legislative session. Hertzberg and Assemblyman Tom McClintock (R-Northridge) wrote the initial legislation two years ago that set up the secession process, and they support state funding for the study.
In turn, the commission, which was also created by Hertzberg and is chaired by San Diego Mayor Susan Golding, is holding a series of meetings and plans to release its recommendation next month. It met Monday in downtown Los Angeles to take suggestions from opponents and proponents of Valley secession.
Kelly Martin, Riordan’s chief of staff, told the commission that city leaders planned to provide the reams of information needed for the massive analysis, but were concerned that they would have to pay to collect the data.
“The city is having this foisted upon us,” Martin said. “We didn’t say to all the voters in Los Angeles, ‘is this OK with you, is this where you want us to spend your money?’ ”
Yaroslavsky said the state secession law passed two years ago was intended to ensure that citizens can vote on the issue, but had not addressed funding issues that could block an election. He suggested a possible public vote on funding secession studies.
“Unless there is some burden sharing here, this process is going to be stillborn,” he said. “I don’t think anyone who took part in the legislation wanted that.”
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.