BEYOND REBELLION

VISITORS to the sprawling Chicano art show opening today at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art are greeted by a display of photos depicting a group of daring guerrilla street artists known as ASCO, Spanish for “nausea.” The photographs are from the early 1970s -- which seems to defy the show’s title, “Phantom Sightings: Art After the Chicano Movement.”

In one famous photo from 1972, in the midst of the movement, the museum itself was the target of these Dadaesque subversives protesting the exclusion of Chicano art from its galleries. In “Spray Paint LACMA,” ASCO member Patssi Valdez is seen posing outside the museum’s walls, which had been tagged overnight by her rebellious cohorts, Gronk, Willie Herron III and Harry Gamboa Jr. This act of creative defiance -- turning the building into a Chicano canvas -- is now enshrined in the very place that sparked the protest by treating Chicanos as the phantoms of the art world. So does this mean that Chicano artists have finally found the acceptance they sought? That they can now put down their spray cans and pursue careers as equals in a harmonious “post-ethnic” art world?

“I have a feeling if I was a young person today, I don’t think I would spray paint the museum,” Gamboa, 56, an author and college lecturer, answers slyly. “Because now, [tagging] has been felonized, and to put three signatures on a county building might result in three strikes. Who knows if we would all wind up in prison for life and never have the chance to pursue careers as artists?”

Half the artists in the current exhibition weren’t even born when Gamboa and company tagged the museum, but they carry on the ASCO conceptual tradition by expressing their own set of social concerns in bold, albeit at times oblique, ways. Thus, the choice of ASCO as preamble is an intriguing invitation to rethink Chicano art, past and present.

“Phantom Sightings” (a phrase adapted from Gamboa’s writings) features more than 120 works, including 10 commissioned specifically for the occasion, by 31 artists from across the country, some of whom don’t call themselves Chicano. Most came of age in the 1990s and several have just recently started to draw international attention. Three -- Ruben Ochoa, Eduardo Sarabia and Mario Ybarra Jr. -- are currently represented in the sometimes reputation-making Whitney Biennial in New York.

Curated by Rita Gonzalez, Howard Fox and Chon Noriega, this is the first major Chicano group exhibition presented at LACMA since 1987’s “Hispanic Art in the United States,” which was organized by the Houston Museum of Fine Arts. And it is the first such show organized for LACMA itself in more than three decades, since its ground-breaking “Chicanismo en el Arte” in 1975 and “Los Four” the year before.

Unlike past Chicano art shows that focused heavily on paintings, the new collection highlights work in an array of styles and formats, including sculpture, mixed-media installations, photo-based pieces and so-called interventions, art that interjects itself in public spaces or social settings. Since much of the work is conceptual, “Phantom Sightings” is likely to leave some viewers scratching their heads, needing help deciphering what artists had in mind with animated blobs that change shape (Ruben Ortiz Torres) or droopy replicas of kitchen appliances made of vinyl (Margarita Cabrera). Essays and artist bios are included in a 240-page companion catalog that is bound to become a reference work.

Variety, not ethnicity, is the show’s hallmark. Artist Ken Gonzales-Day deals with the lynching of Mexican Americans in California by digitally erasing the victims from historic photos. Sandra de la Loza, meanwhile, fills in the gaps that history erased by placing plaques (that are quickly removed) in places such as the whitewashed Siqueiros mural at Olvera Street. And Julio Cesar Morales reveals the resourcefulness of immigrants trying to cross the border illegally by exposing them in their hiding places, such as the little girl inside a pinata, through transparent water-color illustrations based on real cases.

The art is by turns provocative, fanciful, stunning, strange and even noisy, in the case of one audio installation titled “Migrant Dubs.” Fox calls the show “a visually cacophonous and unruly thing.” To some extent, it reflects the hardscrabble barrios where some of these artists were nurtured. That street aesthetic is reflected in the design for the exhibition, with rough-hewn plywood structures, and in signage and promotions using old-fashioned wheat paste posters.

Big expectations

The show is generating intense expectations, partly due to how rarely the museum turns its attention to Chicano art in its own backyard, as opposed to Mexican or Latin American art. Galleries from Santa Monica to East L.A. are staging shows to ride the coattails of “Phantom Sightings.”

Even for the few midcareer artists in the show, participation can mean validation. “It’s wonderful that I’m showing with a lot of up-and-coming or emerging artists,” says Delilah Montoya, 52, a Texas-based photographer. “It makes me feel as though I’ve been going down the right track.”

But the show is also stirring debate, starting with the subtitle, which draws its own line of partition: “Art After the Chicano Movement.” It suggests not only a generational but an aesthetic break with Chicano artists who emerged during the civil rights struggle, known for illustrative paintings and murals, political content and traditional iconography, such as revolutionaries, lowriders and the Virgin of Guadalupe.

With its emphasis on younger artists who don’t wear their ethnicities on their canvases, “Phantom Sightings” seems to be inaugurating a “post-ethnic” Chicano era. Coming at the height of a presidential campaign in which some hail Sen. Barack Obama as the first “post racial” candidate, the timing seems propitious.

Yet some worry that implication is demeaning. “The inherited plight and struggle and history of the Chicano art movement is not one you can toy with, not without expecting any sort of questioning,” says Reyes Rodriguez, director of Tropico de Nopal, a gallery near downtown that has exhibited several of the artists in the show. “Do we just keep quiet and allow LACMA to declare that Chicano art is dead? What does that really mean? That you want to be more European or more a part of, let’s call it the Anglo world, or whatever it is that validates you? Is that really success? Do we not have a voice of our own?”

The notion of ethnic identity as passe is pervasive in contemporary American society, not only in the arts but in pop music, politics, journalism and literature. At some art schools, being post-ethnic is almost an admission requirement. Yet some young artists still question the burden that the post-racial ethos places exclusively on racial minorities.

“People say multiculturalism is dead and we’re, like, ‘OK, when’s the post-white show?’ ” says Eamon Ore-Giron, who holds an MFA from UCLA and collaborated on the “Migrant Dubs” exhibit. “Nowadays, it’s almost as if your identity is erased, in a lot of ways. But at the same time, you are who you are, and that’s what you’re going to represent.”

“Phantom Sightings” emerged from LACMA’s Latino Arts Initiative, launched in 2004 under former director Andrea Rich and designed as a collaboration between the museum and UCLA’s Chicano Studies Research Center. Noriega was named an adjunct curator and put in charge of the five-year plan to develop exhibitions, publications and other projects.

One of the projects already on the books then was a plan to exhibit highlights from the Chicano art collection of actor and comedian Cheech Marin. That show, a spinoff of Marin’s larger exhibition called “Chicano Visions,” is now scheduled to open at LACMA in June under the title “Los Angelenos/Chicano Painters of L.A.: Selections From the Cheech Marin Collection.”

What the news release about the initiative did not mention was the contentious, behind-the-scenes negotiations between Marin and the museum, which originally turned down his show outright. The actor threatened to go public with the issue before museum officials agreed to the scaled-down version of “Chicano Visions,” which has since toured the country to sold-out and sometimes record crowds.

The museum’s initial resistance, explains Noriega, was based on its reluctance to showcase private collections.

But Marin scoffs at the rationale, pointing to LACMA’s gleaming new wing named after billionaire developer Eli Broad, who lent his collection for display. “It was ironic to me,” says Marin. “You would think L.A. would be the first museum to sign up for the show. But, in fact, it was the last.”

The very timing of these back-to-back shows raises some questions. Is the museum again signaling a generational split? Is it drawing a line between the young artists of “Phantom Sightings” and the older ones in the “Marin Collection”?

“I would hope not,” says Noriega. “I would hope that people would attend both shows and come out and go, ‘Wow, these are some pretty big bookends for a category called Chicano art! I would like to see some of the stuff that comes in between.’ ”

“Phantom Sightings” does not attempt to present a survey of Chicano art from the last show to the present, as if the museum were trying to pick up where it left off in 1975. “We thought it would be a disservice to the field to do that kind of show because in some ways it would sanction the idea that institutions can kind of catch up every one to three decades,” says Noriega. “Besides, it’s an impossible task, in many ways doomed to failure like the Whitney Biennial. No, we do much better if we accept the institution’s commitment to ongoing activity in this area.”

Changing times

CONTEMPORARY Chicano artists are working in a social environment vastly different from the days of the Chicano movement. In Los Angeles, to begin with, the Latino population has boomed, putting demographic pressure on cultural institutions to respond. Recurrent waves of immigrants constantly revive the issues of marginalization and social acceptance, even as the offspring of previous generations progress up the social ladder, taking leadership roles as politicians, academics and curators, which were practically nonexistent 30 years ago.

Most of the artists in “Phantom Sightings” were born in the 1970s and live and work in Los Angeles. The oldest is 52 (not counting ASCO); the youngest 27. All have advanced degrees, 20 with masters of fine arts, most from California schools. Only two were born in Mexico.

Whether they call themselves Chicano or not, several artists explore issues of class and culture inherent in their backgrounds. In many cases, artists transform mundane objects from their everyday experience to make imaginative or pointed statements with the byproduct.

El Paso artist Adrian Esparza, for example, unspools the threads of a multicolored Mexican serape to create an abstract geometric pattern, thereby “taking artisanal traditions and using them in a postmodern way,” as Fox puts it. Margarita Cabrera, also from El Paso, uses fabric from U.S. Border Patrol uniforms to create realistic cactus sculptures that conjures “a conceptual link between an unforgiving landscape and the relatively recent criminalization of border crossing,” as Noriega explains in the catalog.

Perhaps the most obvious example of the mundane exalted as art is Ochoa’s use of his family’s tortilla delivery truck as a mobile art gallery. The L.A.-based artist emptied the interior of the slab-sided 1985 Chevy van and “just tricked it out” with white walls, track lighting and linoleum flooring and invited his friends to create projects for the road.

He called it “Class C,” for the DMV’s commercial license category, and did 75 shows from 2001 to 2005, “bringing contemporary art to the neighborhood and not dumbing it down.” “I was the collaborator, curator, driver, installer and mechanic,” says Ochoa, one of five artists in the exhibition who attended Otis College of Art and Design and one of six with MFAs from UC Irvine. “I’d move it around as far as my Triple-A miles would take me because it would break down and I had to tow it back.”

Ochoa, born in Oceanside to Mexican immigrants, was practically raised inside that van, recruited like so many of his first-generation peers to work in their parents’ business. Yet he represents a new generation of Chicanos who want to be identified primarily by their work, not their background, even though their barrio shapes their art.

“It’s laid in the work, but it doesn’t have to be highlighted,” he says. “A lot of my work deals with different class tensions, boundaries and barriers, but it doesn’t have to be solely the Mexican American experience.”

For Gamboa, the former ASCO tagger, it doesn’t matter what you call it as long as you give it a chance. “It’s always been my contention that Chicanos are a co-equal culture and capable of participating and sharing and contributing,” he says. “At some level, [the show] just gives people hope that it’s possible to actually create work and have it recognized as being art.”

--

agustin.gurza@latimes.com

--

(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX)

Chicano art

Where: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 5905 Wilshire Blvd.

When: Noon to 8 p.m. Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays; noon to 9 p.m. Fridays; 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays. Closed Wednesdays.

Ends: Sept. 1

Price: Adults, $12; seniors and students, $8; children under 18, free

Contact: (323) 857-6000; www.lacma.org

--

THE ARTISTS

In their own words, three participants reflect

on their work, the show and what it means to be a Chicano artist.

DELILAH MONTOYA

Born in Fort Worth, 1955

Lives and works in Houston

and Albuquerque

AS a teenager in Omaha, I remember going to my high school teacher and very defiantly telling her, “I’m a Chicana artist!” She looked at me and said, “There’s no such thing.” So I was going to prove to her that yes there is. Later when I entered the academic world and tried to find Chicano art, I was coming up really empty-handed. I found that we were in the process of inventing ourselves. So my art had a lot to do with the self-inventive nature of the Chicano Movement.

I always feel like I’m still emerging, like I’m just breaking out of the gate somehow. It has to do with the way creativity works. You always have to question yourself and the things around you. It keeps you on the edge of always trying to understand.

What is occurring now is that we’re getting this new [immigrant] generation that is bringing more life into the culture. They’re re-Hispanicizing us. It’s our otro yo [other self] that is coming to join us. That means the culture is always changing; it’s a living culture.

--

JUAN CAPISTRAN

Born in Guadalajara, 1976

Lives and works in Los Angeles

I personally have never called myself Chicano, which to me was like a dated term. It seemed to be something that happened in the ‘60s and ‘70s but didn’t have anything to do with me because of where I was growing up and how I grew up. It just seemed like something far away from me. I grew up in South-Central L.A., pretty much around African Americans, and I had an affinity toward black culture as opposed to my own culture. My parents are a traditional Mexican family, but I gravitated toward other cultures just to find my place here.

A lot of my work references popular forms of music, and subcultures that surround music. I’m also a DJ, so I’m interested in the art of remixing or appropriation. The music allows me to have these multiple points of view, where I’m not tied down to one singular identity. It kind of opens up the dialogue.

Being in this show is like a homecoming. I’ve had more success outside of L.A., so it’s always good to be part of a big historical show in your hometown.

--

RUBEN ORTIZ TORRES

Born in Mexico City, 1964

Lives and works in Los Angeles

WE navigate treacherous waters because there seems to be this binary model where you have, on the one hand, international globalized art and, on the other, a regionally specific notion of what art and culture could be. Artists have been forced to choose one or the other. Either you participate in the art world and show in fancy galleries, or you show in the community and represent where you’re coming from. But there’s a new generation of artists who refuse to play that game. They want to have it both ways. We want to be international but we want to be local as well.

“Art After the Chicano Movement” is not negating the Chicano movement. It reaffirms it, but it wants to engage those issues with the notion of art at large. We’re not trying to choose between one position or the other, but somehow negotiate between both.

This show makes me feel part of a scene. I’ve never been so proud to be in a show with a bunch of my students. My hope is that it will break with stereotypes about the possibilities and limitations of artists of color, in particular Mexican and Mexican American artists.

--

-- Agustin Gurza