Banning land mines; opposing views on Glenn Beck; America’s haves and have-nots
Land mine lunacy
Re “U.S. backtracks on land mine ban,” Nov. 26
I am ashamed that the Obama administration may not join more than 150 countries in banning land mines -- a huge atrocity that mankind (an oxymoron in this context) continues to inflict on our mangled planet. How can America condone the continued planting of land mines when we grieve over our young men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan being killed daily by crude versions of the devices? Such hypocrisy!
Land mines kill or maim people every day. There are reportedly more than 110 million mines worldwide, and the cost, beyond lost lives, is staggering: medical costs, land unable to be farmed, removal costs and injuries to animals. Pictures of flag-draped caskets and one-legged children on handmade crutches are too heartbreaking to bear.
President Obama -- not in my name!
Lloyd A. Dent
Studio City
Skeptical of CalPERS
Re “CalPERS probes advisor oversight,” Nov. 25
I want to personally thank The Times for the very disturbing and revealing articles on the California Public Employees’ Retirement System.
I have been a member of CalPERS for more than 33 years and expect to retire soon. All these years I believed that CalPERS was a sound, safe, conservative and ethically managed fund.
Now I think my beliefs may be illusionary.
Your articles have shocked and angered me, both as a member and a taxpayer. Now it seems the very people who were allegedly involved in this “pay to play” are the hard-charging reformers.
Somehow I keep thinking of the allegory of cockroaches running when stunned by a bright light. The Times has shined that light, and I am very grateful.
Unfortunately, I don’t think I am too cynical in believing that some will resign and few will ever be punished.
Chris Keller
West Covina
Who’d want to work there?
Re “Probation chief’s position a tough sell,” Nov. 26
Having observed the supervisors in action, I can understand why Los Angeles County has trouble filling key positions. The supervisors not only try to micromanage their departments; worse, they publicly excoriate their executives for problems of their own making.
I wouldn’t accept an executive position in L.A. County under the current leadership.
Walter L. Johnson
Santa Monica
Prohibition’s lessons
Re “A U.S. drug foe who was seen as incorruptible,” Nov. 22
Richard Padilla Cramer’s sellout to drug lords in Mexico comes as no surprise. Corruption at every level is the way prohibition works.
During the prohibition of alcohol, Al Capone often boasted that half the cops in Chicago were on his payroll.
That some succumb to the temptation of bribes and the riches to be had dealing drugs should come as no surprise. Dishonesty is just part of the drug war territory.
Floyd Krautner
Bakersfield
Giving voice to Beck
Re “Watching Glenn Beck,” Opinion, Nov. 25
Tim Rutten is convinced Fox News should remove Glenn Beck because Beck “intends to use his TV and radio shows to promote a mass movement that will involve voter registration drives, training in community organizing and a series of regional conventions” to change the current political culture.
Where have I heard those tactics utilized before? Oh, that’s right! Barack Obama and ACORN used the same strategy during Obama’s presidential campaign.
It’s apparent that in Rutten’s mind, what’s good for the goose isn’t necessarily good for the gander, and his comments only reinforce what most conservatives already believe -- that the left hates it when the right has the audacity to use the same methods they do to stir the political pot.
Please forgive us if we conservatives sometimes forget that the left owns the market on civil disobedience as a method to bring about change.
Jim Valencia
Chino Hills
Does Rutten ever consider why Fox News has more viewers than the other cable news channels combined? Does he ever wonder why the majority of us lowly “working class” people are angry at what is being done by Obama and his administration?
Beck speaks for many of us who have no voice in this administration and who want to return to the tenets of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I believe that there are multitudes who are extremely scared -- not of Beck, but of our president. You must refer to us as “tea baggers” and write insulting articles in your newspaper because you are scared of us. We number in the millions.
What we really need is a revolution in this country -- to take it back from legislators who ignore the wishes of the voters and a president who is more concerned with healthcare than creating jobs for millions of suffering Americans.
Anne Grogan
Bakersfield
So Beck finds himself constrained by the outreach of his present pulpit at Fox News and has announced grandiose plans to launch a national movement to promote his crackpot views.
The scary part is that already a too-large sector of the American public accepts as fact every crazy idea relentlessly peddled by the “tea party” crowds -- like death panels for granny and birthers who still don’t believe the president is a U.S. citizen.
Uninformed or misinformed by some of the news media, these delusional masses would regard Beck and Sarah Palin as a dream ticket for 2012. Unlikely only because both are now too full of themselves to take second billing.
Saul Halpert
Studio City
I don’t think that either Rutten or the Anti-Defamation League needs to worry about Beck’s demagoguery. An intelligent audience is capable of filtering out untruths and exaggerations.
I have watched Beck and understand his concern about the direction that Obama is taking in fundamentally changing America. My belief is that Beck has the right to express these views; Rutten implied that Fox News should remove Beck’s show.
Is this the America that Beck fears, one where a respected newspaper features an opinion article that advocates the stifling of free speech?
Charles Kramer
Alta Loma
America’s haves and have-nots
Re “Multitudes need a hand up,” Column, Nov. 25
We couldn’t help noticing the incongruity of the haves and have-nots: On the one hand, Steve Lopez describes a growing number of unemployed turning to a local food pantry; on the other, The Times, in five large display ads surrounding the Lopez story, solicits for those who can afford luxury items such as diamonds, Rolex watches and $100 photo frames.
We were about to suggest that the potential buyers of the latter frivolities summon up their holiday spirit and divert their funds toward food pantries and other charitable organizations -- when we realized that support for the jewelers and others is helping keep another group from the ranks of the jobless: Times print journalists.
Multifaceted tough times with no easy solutions.
Sam and Bonnie Kane
Woodland Hills
Re “He’ll live to see Thanksgiving,” and “Comedy for a cause,” Nov. 25
Page A14: There is a photo of a turkey staying in a deluxe suite at a smart hotel in Washington.
Page A9: There is a photo of a 97-year-old Californian who had to live in her car.
There is something just a tad wrong with these pictures, America.
Penelope Burley
Santa Rosa Valley
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.