Advertisement

Twitter must tell fired workers about severance lawsuit, judge rules

A receptionist works in the lobby of the building that houses the Twitter office in New York.
Twitter wants employees who accept a severance package to sign a waiver agreeing not to join lawsuits against the company. A judge has ruled that Twitter must advise them of the existence of a class-action lawsuit before asking them to sign the waiver.
(Mary Altaffer / Associated Press)
Share via

Twitter employees terminated in Elon Musk’s mass layoffs must be told about a lawsuit on their behalf against the company before they’re asked to give up their legal rights to qualify for severance pay, a judge ruled.

Twitter wants employees who accept a severance package that includes a month of base pay to sign a waiver agreeing not to join lawsuits against the company. The agreement doesn’t mention the existence of a class-action suit filed just before hundreds of people were fired in early November after Elon Musk’s takeover.

A company’s communications with workers about severance packages “should not be rendered misleading by omitting material information about a pending lawsuit,” U.S. District Judge James Donato said in Wednesday’s order, adding that proper notice will “promote the fair and efficient administration” of the litigation.

Advertisement

Filed by a handful of workers, the suit alleges Twitter failed to give the required 60 to 90 days’ notice about the mass layoffs and is shortchanging the former employees on severance pay. Twitter faces separate claims that it retaliated against an employee who tried to organize a strike and that its layoffs disproportionately targeted female workers.

“Today’s decision is a victory for Twitter employees who for weeks have been abused by Elon Musk,” Shannon Liss-Riordan, a lawyer for the workers, said in an emailed statement. “The court’s ruling that Twitter must notify employees of our legal action is a basic but important step that will provide employees with the opportunity to more fully understand their rights instead of just signing them away, and potentially signing away money they are owed, under pressure from Musk.”

Labor attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan says she’s ready to wage an arbitration war against Musk, if necessary, on behalf of former Twitter employees.

Liss-Riordan previously tangled with Musk over layoffs at Tesla, his electric-car company. She argues in the Twitter suit that former workers are entitled to at least two months’ base pay, and maybe more depending on the number of years they worked there.

Advertisement

Under the previous agreement, they’re also supposed to get three months of equity vesting, healthcare contributions and bonuses, she said.

As Tesla contended in the lawsuit over its layoffs, Twitter argued its former employees are bound by contractual agreements requiring them to resolve any disputes with the company in closed-door arbitration rather than in open court. A hearing on Twitter’s request to force the workers into arbitration is set for January. In the Tesla case, a judge in Texas ordered the workers to go through arbitration.

After Musk bought the social media company for $44 billion, he fired half the workforce, asked some employees to return, rolled back its expansive work-from-home policy and called on workers to sign a pledge to remain “extremely hardcore” at Twitter or quit.

Advertisement