4 more officers suspected of adding false gang information to LAPD files
At least four more Los Angeles police officers are suspected by prosecutors of putting false gang information on field interview cards, according to an internal record from the L.A. County district attorney’s office.
The claims bring the total number of Metropolitan Division officers suspected of inputting false information on such cards to 10. The six others were criminally charged in the case last year; each has pleaded not guilty.
It was unclear whether the additional four officers, who remain under investigation, would also face charges. Dist. Atty George Gascón’s office declined to comment on the matter. Capt. Stacy Spell, an LAPD spokesman, said the department also would not comment for fear of jeopardizing the integrity of an ongoing investigation.
The document identified three of the four officers by their last names: Fernandez, McGinley and Walker. The fourth officer was identified as “Officer Samantha Stauber (Fielder),” though her attorney, Matthew McNicholas, identified her as Samantha Fiedler.
An officer in the LAPD’s Metro Division alleges in a lawsuit that commanders have enforced a de facto quota system that rewarded officers who arrested a lot of alleged gang members.
Fiedler filed a civil lawsuit last year alleging she was targeted amid the broader gang-labeling scandal — and taken off the streets — because commanders feared she would blow the whistle on an unspoken quota system that put pressure on Metro officers to identify gang members regularly.
“Minimums had to be met,” Fiedler alleged in her pending civil lawsuit in California Superior Court.
In the district attorney’s document, prosecutors allege she entered false gang information on four different field interview cards. Prosecutors also alleged an Officer McGinley entered false information on one card, and that an Officer Fernandez and an Officer Walker appeared to do the same.
McNicholas said Fiedler had not been told which cards allegedly included incorrect information and had received no indication that she would be criminally charged and did not expect to be. McNicholas said that if prosecutors had any evidence Fiedler had intentionally input false information on cards, “she would already be charged.”
Bill Seki, another attorney, said he represents Officer John Walker, who has been on administrative leave since the investigation began.
Seki said Walker never falsified information or did anything wrong. He said the process for filing field interview cards was never formalized, so officers would sometimes gather additional information on a person after a field interview, from colleagues or prior records, and include it on the cards before submitting them.
Seki said it was his understanding that the district attorney’s office had decided not to file any charges against Walker, though an administrative review by the Los Angeles Police Department is still ongoing.
The document from Gascón’s office, obtained by The Times through a public records request, was drafted to explain prosecutors’ decisions not to file charges against 19 other officers whose actions had also come under review as part of the broader investigation.
It provided the latest accounting of a sprawling investigation that was sparked in 2019 after a Van Nuys mother challenged the gang classification of her son. LAPD supervisors found inconsistencies between the officer’s account and body-camera video of the stop, and a broader probe was launched.
In July 2020, prosecutors charged Officers Braxton Shaw, Michael Coblentz and Nicolas Martinez with conspiracy to obstruct justice and multiple counts of filing a false police report and preparing false documentary evidence. In October, prosecutors charged three more officers — Rene Braga, Julio Garcia and Raul Uribe — with falsifying information on field interview cards.
Prosecutors alleged the officers had written on field interview cards that people admitted to being gang members when footage from their body cameras showed no such admissions or showed the people explicitly denying gang affiliations.
LAPD told a San Fernando Valley mother that her son was in a gang. She said he wasn’t. The ensuing investigation uncovered inconsistencies in officers’ reports.
All six officers have pleaded not guilty and are awaiting trial.
The charges bolstered long-standing claims from activists and members of the public that the LAPD labeled people as gang members with little or no evidence, and sparked immediate outrage and calls for reform. Such labels can follow people through their lives and hurt their employment and housing prospects, advocates say.
Amid uproar over the alleged misconduct, the LAPD stopped submitting gang information to the state’s shared CalGang database, and state officials barred other agencies in the state from using files that were input into the system by the LAPD. Prosecutors also began dropping felony cases that stemmed from work conducted by the charged officers.
In the district attorney’s document, prosecutors said five LAPD officers remained under investigation.
Prosecutors said the 19 officers who wouldn’t be charged were present during instances where other officers allegedly provided false information on field interview cards but that an analysis of body-worn video, field interview cards and other records indicated they were unaware of the misconduct.
“They either had no participation in the preparation of the [field interview] cards at all or, if they did, the information they provided was accurate,” prosecutors wrote. “There is no evidence that they aided and abetted their fellow officers’ misconduct.”
Prosecutors noted in several cases that interview cards from stops involving the 19 officers were missing when investigators went to review them but provided no explanation as to whether or how that was considered in their decision to clear the officers.
Neither Gascón’s office nor the LAPD would answer questions about the missing cards.
Los Angeles Times staff writers Richard Winton and Alene Tchekmedyian contributed to this report.
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
