Site of senior housing project carefully chosen
Recently, in a letter to the editor, Robert Speed attacked the City
Council and staff relative to the current plan for our affordable
senior housing project, and it was disturbing to see inaccuracies and
the omission of some important information as well as a clear lack of
knowledge of the facts in Speed’s letter (“What’s going on at Lower
Bayview Landing?” Thursday).
First, the only “rush” on this project is to get it on an agenda
of the California Coastal Commission so that tax-exempt state
financing for the project can be approved in time for the project to
begin construction by this December.
The reason for this schedule is a new state law that requires the
payment of prevailing wages for any project that is using public
funds. Our senior housing project would be subject to that law
because the city has agreed to make a loan of $1 million from our
affordable housing in-lieu fund (money paid to the city by developers
of market-rate housing). Prevailing wages will increase the cost of
the project by about a million dollars, and the city has agreed to
increase our loan to pay half that increased cost.
Although the Legislature recognized that the law would impact the
feasibility of affordable housing development, which other state laws
require , and provided an exemption for affordable housing projects,
that’s good only for projects under construction by December 2003.
This is not a new or rushed project, though. The city and the
Irvine Co. have been working on it for a very long time. State
planning law requires that we have a “housing element” as part of our
general plan, and that it make provision for the development of
housing that is affordable to all income levels.
Newport Beach’s primary program to accomplish this goal requires
developers of market-rate housing to also develop affordable housing,
or to pay an “in-lieu” fee so that the city can assist affordable
housing projects.
As part of the city’s Circulation Improvement and Open Space
Agreement, the Irvine Co. was entitled to develop some 800 housing
units in areas like the Castaways and Harbor Cove. They did not
provide affordable units in these developments, but have been working
with the city since at least 1995 to develop a senior affordable
housing project.
In fact, some people may remember that an earlier City Council
considered putting the senior housing project at Newport Village, but
rejected that because of concerns from the environmental community,
as well as a desire for a passive park in Newport Center. As a
result, we have focused our efforts on Lower Bayview Landing for the
past two years.
Lower Bayview Landing is the lower portion of the vacant land at
Coast Highway, Jamboree Road and Back Bay Drive, and the city’s
general plan has long designated it for retail and service commercial
use, with the option of senior affordable housing.
The bluff portion, or Upper Bayview Landing, is designated for
recreational and environmental open space. This is another site that
the Irvine Co. is dedicating to the city for open space as part of
open space agreement, and it will have minimal grading and
improvements to serve the public as a view park.
The city did conduct environmental studies on this project, and
they were available for written comment during a 30-day public review
period, as well as at hearings before the Planning Commission and
City Council. We received testimony at both hearings from seniors in
our community who are experiencing a need for affordable housing,
concerned neighbors in Villa Point, members of our local
environmental community, and residents who support development of the
view park.
It is true that staff of the Coastal Commission is raising more
environmental issues than were raised in our local review and public
hearings, largely because the commission uses a much broader
definition of wetland than do other state and federal agencies.
We are working with the commission and its staff to resolve this
issue, as well as their concern with the grading proposed for the
housing project. The area to be graded has been significantly altered
for things like the former gas station and the original route of
Jamboree Road (which is the route we are proposing for the bicycle
trail). The proposed project limits grading to these disturbed areas,
minimizes grading where the natural bluff remains, provides
protection and replacement for coastal sage scrub, and includes a
water-quality basin to clean runoff from both park and housing sites.
The residents of the housing project will be 55 years of age and
older and of low income. Although many of the residents will be young
and active enough that they will be driving, experience with
low-income senior housing is that the residents tend to be older than
55 and less likely to “drive everywhere,” as Speed worries.
Experience with senior housing projects has also shown that
generally, the majority of the seniors in the housing project do not
drive at peak hours. So much for concerns of “congested streets.”
Data used to prepare our Community Development Block Grant
applications and our housing element show that Newport Beach has
several hundred senior households in need of housing assistance. More
than half of them are considered very low income, and more than 300
are paying more than half their income on housing.
After months of city staff working with the State Department of
Housing and Community Development, we received their certification of
our housing element just last week. This certification of compliance
with state law would not have been granted without the city’s strong
commitment to construction of the senior housing project at Lower
Bayview Landing. If we fail to complete this project, the city would
need to find another site to accommodate 150 housing units, or
certification would be in jeopardy and the city could be subject to a
lawsuit. (It’s happened before.)
Too often, seniors are either forgotten or must settle, at best,
for second best. We have never treated our senior population like
that and we are not going to start now.
In a community as fully developed as Newport Beach, where would we
find another site? Would we need to reconsider development of Newport
Village? Probably.
Two years ago, I worked very hard to be sure that Newport Village
became a park. It was very much an adversarial process and it was my
“baptism under fire” so to speak as a then new councilman, and to
this day, I am convinced the effort was worthwhile. However, so there
is no misconception, as much as I do want a park at that site, an
affordable senior housing project will, in my level of priorities,
exist there if for any reason Lower Bayview does not pan out for the
senior project.
It’s difficult in such a brief communication to explain the
complexities of this project, the competing state laws the city is
trying to follow, and the needs of our senior residents that we are
trying to meet. I hope I have conveyed the balancing act the city has
had to do with this project, and that our citizens will recognize
that due consideration was given to all issues, even if they may not
agree with the final outcome. For my sense, this is a very
responsible and most importantly, an exemplary project.
* STEVE BROMBERG is the mayor of Newport Beach.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.