Mayor Bob Filner could be ousted under obscure city charter provision

The San Diego City Council, unanimous in its eagerness to oust Mayor Bob Filner, will be asked to consider using an obscure part of the city charter to force his removal.

The city attorney’s office, asked by council members to find a way to remove Filner, will suggest to the council at its Aug. 28 meeting that it could invoke a charter provision about removal of “officers” for misusing public money.

If the council agrees, the city attorney’s office would then proceed to build a case against the 70-year-old Democrat, to be presented to a judge for a decision. How a judge would react to such an unusual maneuver is unclear.

The case would involve not recent accusations of sexual harassment that have been leveled against the mayor, but alleged misuse of a city credit card for personal expenses.

The San Diego County Taxpayers Assn., citing news reports, asserted Thursday that of the mayor’s $11,095 in credit card expenses, nearly $1,000 were for personal items, including pizzas, juicers and expensive lunches.

“City credit cards cannot be used for personal expenses. Period,” said Felipe Monroig, president of the taxpayers group.

While the city charter does not include a provision for impeachment, City Atty. Jan Goldsmith has said that Section 108 could, in effect, accomplish the same thing. The section was approved by voters in 1931.

Under the section, Goldsmith said in a memo this week to council members, “every city officer who willfully approves or allows an unauthorized payment from the city treasury is subject to removal from office.”

Use of the Section 108 would leave the council in uncharted legal territory, Goldsmith’s memo indicates. The charter provision is not explicit on how it should be enforced.

If the council authorizes use of the section against Filner, Goldsmith said his office could then file a request with the Superior Court for enforcement stating that Filner has misused public money and should be removed.

While Section 108 has never been used to remove a San Diego elected official, there is precedent for an official being removed from office for misusing a city credit card.

In 1986, then-Councilman Uvaldo Martinez resigned as part of a plea bargain with the district attorney in which he admitted guilt to two felony charges.

Martinez had initially been charged with 27 felony counts of using the credit card for $1,800 of personal expenses, mostly meals, and then filing phony expense reports. After Martinez resigned, the council appointed a replacement who promised not to seek election.

In 1987 an election was held to select a replacement. The winner was a former school board member and San Diego State history professor: Bob Filner.

ALSO:

Hannah Anderson’s first public appearance heartens supporters

Bloodied San Bernardino man arrested in deadly machete attack

Husband stands by Corona teacher facing student sex allegations

Twitter: @LATsandiego

tony.perry@latimes.com