UC Berkeley repeats as top public university in U.S. News rankings

UC Berkeley is again the highest-ranked public university in closely watched university rankings released Tuesday by U.S. News & World Report.

Berkeley tied with Georgetown for 20th among national universities overall, despite some scoring changes that give more weight to students’ graduation rates. Last year, Berkeley was tied for 21st.

Crosstown rivals UCLA and USC, meanwhile, shared 23rd place among national universities, along with Carnegie Mellon and the University of Virginia, according to the magazine’s list. Last year, the two Los Angeles schools were tied at 24th with Virginia.

Other UC campuses in this year’s top 50 were: Davis and San Diego, which tied for 39th; Santa Barbara, 41st; and Irvine, 49th.

The magazine said its methodology this year shifted emphasis somewhat from the academic prowess of incoming students, measured by such things as high school class rankings, to how well they do in college by earning a degree. But those changes had little effect on the rankings of the top 50 national universities because they score high in graduation rates. They also have large financial endowments and resources for faculty that are important in the rankings.

The top 10 schools were the same as last year, but with some slight changes in order. Princeton was first, followed by Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Stanford, the University of Chicago; then a tie among Duke, MIT and the University of Pennsylvania; and Caltech in Pasadena at 10th.

The listing has been criticized over the years for giving too much credence to schools’ wealth and selectivity in admissions. Yet because parents, students and school governing boards track it carefully, many colleges do everything they can to score high. Some schools have been accused of manipulating data.

Katy Murphy, who is president-elect of the National Assn. for College Admission Counseling and heads the counseling department at Bellarmine College Preparatory high school in San Jose, said many parents rely too heavily on magazine and other college rankings because they want “outside validation of quality.” She urged families to look more deeply to find “what fits for them.”

The methodology this year slightly reduced the points for how hard it is to gain admission and shifted those to measures of retaining and graduating students, according to Robert Morse, who heads the “Best Colleges” lists for U.S. News & World Report. Because fewer high schools are reporting students’ class rankings, the magazine also cut the importance of that and increased the weight of incoming freshmen scores on SAT or ACT exams.

Schools below the top 50 in their category tended to be most affected, Morse said. Among them was Pitzer College in Claremont, which jumped from sharing the 43rd spot last year to 35th this year in the list of national liberal arts schools. Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore, topped that list, followed by a tie among Pomona College in Claremont, Bowdoin and Middlebury. Other Claremont consortium schools did well in that grouping: Claremont McKenna shared ninth place with Davidson and Haverford; Harvey Mudd was 16th; and Scripps was 25th.

The magazine’s changes echo a slice of what the Obama administration has proposed on a more sweeping, more populist manner. By 2015, President Obama wants an evaluation of colleges that includes such factors as average tuition, share of low-income students and effectiveness in ensuring that students graduate without too much debt.

U.S. News’ move is “a small step in the right direction but not nearly enough,” said Clare McCann, an education analyst for the New America Foundation, a Washington, D.C. think tank. The rankings still influence colleges “to act in ways that are not in the best interest of students,” such as spending more money that might drive up tuition, she said.

ALSO:

Authorities probe death of baby allegedly left in SUV by father

Officials search for man off Oceanside after his dog found on beach

Fourth porn actor allegedly tests HIV-positive amid condom-law fight

larry.gordon@latimes.com

Twitter: @larrygordonlat